That is Bare Capitalism fundraising week. 1271 donors have already invested in our efforts to fight corruption and predatory conduct, notably within the monetary realm. Please be a part of us and take part by way of our donation web page, which reveals the best way to give by way of test, bank card, debit card, PayPal, Clover, or Smart. Examine why we’re doing this fundraiser, what we’ve achieved within the final yr, and our present aim, extra authentic reporting.
Yves right here. We’ve posted over commonly about how carbon seize is a con, due amongst different causes to doubtful measures, lack of verification that the promised motion truly occurred, and common double-selling.
This text publicizes a brand new examine that harshly criticizes the carbon seize scheme included within the Biden Inflation Discount Act: carbon seize and storage. We’ve highlighted earlier stories criticizing it as a sop to grease firms, however account is a humdinger. It appears that evidently carbon seize and storage tasks are sometimes fraud ridden, catastrophically costly, susceptible to mechanical failure, and simply plain don’t work.
By Olivia Rosane, a workers author for Widespread Desires. Initially revealed at Widespread Desires
Because the U.S. strikes to put money into local weather options, is the cash going towards tasks that may meaningfully cut back emissions and transition the nation’s vitality system away from fossil fuels?
A report launched Wednesday by worker-owned company accountability and environmental justice analysis group Empower discovered that simply 34 carbon seize and storage (CCS) tasks in Texas might obtain between $3.2 billion and $33 billion in annual tax subsides.
On the identical time, a lot of the carbon dioxide pipelines within the state are managed by the key oil and fuel firms like Kinder Morgan, Occidental Petroleum, and ExxonMobil that performed a disproportionate function in creating the local weather disaster within the first place.
“Carbon seize and storage is the costliest and least efficient carbon mitigation answer. It’s actually not the place we should be investing our cash,” stated Paige Powell, the coverage supervisor at Fee Shift, at a press briefing saying the brand new analysis. “And the general public {dollars} coming from the federal authorities to fossil gasoline firms are our greenbacks, our taxpayer {dollars} that might be higher spent elsewhere.”
“I feel it’s necessary for us to ask ourselves, if carbon seize is receiving a lot public {dollars}, why is there little public enter?”
For its report, Empower turned up 98 carbon dioxide-related tasks within the state of Texas, together with 47 pipelines and 13 Class VI Geological Storage tasks. These tasks are presently primarily funded by way of tax breaks and U.S. Division of Power (DOE) subsides; the report authors discovered little proof of any non-public investments.
“Our report clearly lays out the best way carbon seize tax credit rig the system in favor of the oil and fuel business to the tune of billions of {dollars},” Empower’s Samuel Rosado stated in an announcement. “Public funding and tax breaks are the most important sources of income for CCS tasks. With out the huge federal funding, the non-public sector deems most CCS tasks unprofitable.”
The primary tax credit score for CCS is the 45Q tax credit score, which assigns a greenback quantity for each metric ton of carbon dioxide captured and completely saved. Whereas this credit score was first created by the Power Enchancment and Extension Act of 2008, the Inflation Discount Act expanded it, elevating the credit score to $85 per metric ton. On the identical time, the Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act earmarked greater than $8 billion for the DOE’s CCS applications.
“These are the important thing payments that had been enacted that enabled CCS to be a minimum of extra financially accessible than it beforehand was,” Rosado stated within the briefing.
But local weather and accountability advocates are involved that the cash is being misdirected.
Powell famous that CCS expertise had been round for 50 years, however had didn’t advance.
“All of those tasks have been largely unprofitable, and so they haven’t expanded the best way that renewables and different local weather options have, primarily as a result of the expertise is problematic,” Powell stated. “It’s unsafe, it’s fraught with mechanical failures, and to not point out wildly costly when in comparison with different local weather options.”
Dominic Chacon of the Texas Marketing campaign for the Atmosphere stated that business boosting of CCS amounted to a type of “greenwashing.”
“It’s primarily a advertising and marketing PR branding ploy to downplay the plain dangers related to fossil fuels, to try to rebrand this business as one thing that we’d like for the longer term,” Chacon stated.
Autumn Hanna, the vice chairman of Taxpayers for Widespread Sense, famous that there was a historical past of fraud in previous allocation of CCS subsidies.
“A Treasury investigation discovered that from 2010 to 2019, 90% of tax credit score claimants didn’t adjust to IRS [Internal Revenue Service] and EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] necessities,” Hanna stated in an announcement. “As a substitute of throwing good cash after dangerous, we must always focus our restricted assets on local weather options we all know are protected and efficient.”
On the identical time, most federal CCS subsides truly ended up going towards injecting carbon dioxide into depleted oil wells so as to extract much more oil, which is presently the one worthwhile use of the expertise.
“Persevering with to funnel these subsidies and tax breaks to the oil firms, which largely use it to extract extra fossil fuels, actually weakens its supposed local weather advantages,” Hanna stated within the briefing.
In Texas particularly, there are issues in regards to the security of CCS infrastructure and its affect on ecosystems and communities, given the state’s weak regulatory tradition.
“Our state oil and fuel regulator, the Railroad Fee of Texas, is reluctant to supervise the business in a means that protects individuals and the setting,” Powell stated.
The Empower report discovered that 19 CCS tasks overlap with a minimum of 24 million acres of water, threatening each coastal and river environments. The report authors additionally bumped into an absence of transparency.
After submitting Freedom of Info Act (FOIA) requests to the Environmental Defend Company to entry knowledge about CCS tasks, they obtained paperwork with total pages redacted on the behest of the businesses and with the permission of the EPA.
“That is very harmful in relation to company accountability and transparency on environmental points, as a result of total pages had been redacted from FOIA requests and public info requests which are extremely necessary for communities and security in these communities,” Rosado stated.
The advocates referred to as for better transparency and accountability round public financing for untested and costly local weather options.
Hanna referred to as for placing “the breaks on the entire thing till we begin to actually reply some large questions which are on the market as a substitute of simply autopilot expansions and extensions that carry enormous prices and, once more, go away us with these large questions and this lack of transparency and oversight.”
Neighborhood organizations within the Lone Star State are petitioning the EPA to reject the Texas Railroad Fee’s request to have main oversight over CCS tasks within the state.
“Permitting Texas to proceed down this path is irresponsible and solely serves oil and fuel pursuits. That’s why it’s crucial that the Environmental Safety Company not hand over regulation of harmful CCS tasks to the Railroad Fee of Texas, which has proven that it’s within the pocket of fossil gasoline firms, which stand to revenue whereas placing our communities in danger,” Powell stated in an announcement. “We have to chart a brand new course right here in Texas and in Washington to incentivize local weather options that truly work.”
To that finish, Fee Shift can be urging involved residents to touch upon new EPA draft permits for CCS tasks within the Permian Basin.
“Allow them to know we’d like an extension to overview the permits and that we actually simply don’t need these right here within the Permian, it’s not the precise place for all these tasks,” Powell stated.
