Unlock the Editor’s Digest free of charge
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.
Seven & i Holdings is attempting to find methods to spice up its share worth and bolster its defences forward of what the proprietor of the 7-Eleven model believes is a looming second takeover bid from Alimentation Couche-Tard.
The Japanese group acquired and rejected an virtually $39bn opening provide from Canada’s Couche-Tard final month. It has been exploring the opportunity of promoting non-core property to personal fairness and different buyers, in line with individuals accustomed to the scenario, and accelerating plans to concentrate on its comfort retailer enterprise.
The hunt for options comes as Seven & i tries to seek out methods to display to shareholders that it might probably ship extra worth as an impartial enterprise, in line with the identical individuals.
Alongside different plans, the corporate is contemplating accelerating the sale of its stake in its monetary providers arm, Seven Financial institution, in addition to promoting its grocery store enterprise, which may kick off by the tip of the yr. In April, the group had already signalled that its Ito-Yokado supermarkets, the forerunners to Seven & i, might be listed by 2027.
UBS analysts mentioned that positive aspects from share gross sales of listed Seven Financial institution would imply buyers “may count on extra shareholder returns or funding for development utilizing the proceeds”.
In a be aware to shoppers in August, JPMorgan analysts advised that Seven & i’s grocery store enterprise may have an enterprise worth of ¥232.4bn, or greater than $1.5bn. Nonetheless, additionally they mentioned there may solely be a “minimal enchancment in [Seven & i’s] valuation, even when the corporate sells Ito-Yokado and the financial institution, assuming insufficient reforms of the primary enterprise”.
Ever since Couche-Tard’s takeover bid was made public in August, worldwide and Japanese non-public fairness teams have been circling Seven & i, within the hope that they may participate in a break-up of the retail conglomerate or assume a “white knight” function in a battle for management.
Executives at 4 separate Tokyo-based PE corporations have instructed the Monetary Occasions that they had despatched letters to Seven & i to attempt to open talks.
Couche-Tard’s all-cash provide of $14.86 a share was promptly rejected by Seven & i as “grossly” undervaluing the enterprise, however the Canadian group is extensively anticipated to come back again with an improved bid.
The Japanese group’s share worth is at the moment buying and selling barely above that supply worth and effectively above the place it was earlier than the bid turned public.
One individual accustomed to the matter advised Couche-Tard was ready till after Seven & i’s second-quarter outcomes are printed on Thursday earlier than launching a renewed bid.
Seven & i declined to touch upon the disposal plans, however individuals accustomed to the group’s pondering mentioned that measures to permit the enterprise to concentrate on its comfort retailer empire might be unveiled together with its outcomes.
In addition they famous that Seven & i had been working to streamline the enterprise and enhance returns since earlier than Couche-Tard’s curiosity was made public.
Seven & i has lengthy confronted calls to pay attention extra on its comfort retailer enterprise, together with from activist buyers similar to ValueAct. The corporate has 22,800 comfort shops in Japan in addition to 13,000 within the US.
In its letter to Couche-Tard rejecting the opening bid, Seven & i mentioned it was assured it may unlock shareholder worth “by means of quite a lot of strategic actions, together with however not restricted to our US enterprise, that we’re actively pursuing”.
The Japanese group added that even when Couche-Tard have been to enhance the worth of its proposal “very considerably”, it could not “adequately acknowledge the a number of and important challenges such a transaction would face from US competitors legislation enforcement”.
