In his e book Minority Report, H.L. Mencken writes: “The urge to save lots of humanity is sort of at all times solely a false-face for the urge to rule it. Energy is what all messiahs actually search: not the prospect to serve. That is true even of the pious brethren who carry the gospel [sic] to international components.”
With a bit rewriting, we will replace the quote for protectionism:
“The urge to defend the nation is sort of at all times solely a false-face for the urge to rule it. Energy is what all protectionists search: not the prospect to serve.”
Nationwide protection is a standard justification for protectionist tariffs, and it has been pushed to absurd extremes: clothespins, sugar, and child meals have all been described as very important to nationwide protection and topic to tariffs.
In a very goofy instance, Senator Rick Scott of Florida has referred to as for a ban on Chinese language-grown garlic on the grounds it threatens nationwide safety. Now, maybe if we have been a nation of vampires, this declare would make sense. However it’s laborious to see how garlic, even garlic that’s doubtlessly tainted, is a risk to nationwide safety. Scott argues that the garlic poses a possible well being risk, however that isn’t the identical as a nationwide safety risk.
What’s bizarre in regards to the argument Scott is placing forth is that he doesn’t want to ban Chinese language garlic as a nationwide safety risk whether it is as harmful as he claims. We have already got a meals security program right here within the US, and international items are additionally topic to it. If Chinese language garlic is a public well being risk, the FDA has the authority to behave by issuing recollects and in any other case successfully banning the contaminated product if it poses a risk to human or animal well being. It’s unclear why Senator Scott’s act is required.
To return to a theme I’ve been harping on in current posts, any intervention must be justified past just a few hypothetical musing. Merely displaying that some intervention may accomplish some desired consequence doesn’t imply the motion is justified or fascinating. We have to study the present state of legal guidelines and laws to see if the intervention is definitely justified, or whether it is simply rank corruption hiding behind a false-face. One query Senator Scott (or others who defend this intervention) should reply is: why is the present laws insufficient? It’s already unlawful to promote tainted meals within the US. If Chinese language garlic is such a risk, why hasn’t the FDA shut it down?
Nationwide protection is a type of justifications that individuals don’t appear to consider that a lot. It’s invoked and easily not questioned. Certainly, that is most likely why “nationwide protection” is such a profitable false-face to rent-seek: few look too intently on the masks. Maybe, just like the partygoers at Poe’s masquerade within the Masque of the Learn Demise, the individuals who assist spurious nationwide protection claims are afraid to see what lies beneath that masks.
Jon Murphy is an assistant professor of economics at Nicholls State College.
