This story was initially printed by Grist. Join Grist’s weekly e-newsletter right here.
Earlier this 12 months, the e-commerce company Amazon secured approval to open two new information facilities in Santiago, Chile. The $400 million enterprise is the corporate’s first foray into finding its information amenities, which guzzle huge quantities of electrical energy and water with the intention to energy cloud computing providers and on-line packages, in Latin America — and in some of the water-stressed international locations on the planet, the place residents have protested towards the trade’s growth.
This week, the tech large made a separate however associated announcement. It plans to put money into water conservation alongside the Maipo River, which is the first supply of water for the Santiago area. Amazon will companion with a water expertise startup to assist farmers alongside the river set up drip irrigation techniques on 165 acres of farmland. The plan is poised to preserve sufficient water to produce round 300 houses per 12 months, and it’s a part of Amazon’s marketing campaign to make its cloud computing operations “water constructive” by 2030, which means the corporate’s net providers division will preserve or replenish extra water than it makes use of up.
The reasoning behind this water initiative is evident: Information facilities require giant quantities of water to chill their servers, and Amazon plans to spend $100 billion to construct extra of them over the following decade as a part of an enormous wager on its Amazon Net Providers cloud-computing platform. Different tech corporations similar to Microsoft and Meta, that are additionally investing in information facilities to maintain the artificial-intelligence growth, have made related water pledges amid a rising controversy in regards to the sector’s thirst for water and energy.
Amazon claims that its information facilities are already among the many most water-efficient within the trade, and it plans to roll out extra conservation initiatives to mitigate its thirst. Nevertheless, similar to company pledges to achieve “net-zero” emissions, these water pledges are extra advanced than they appear at first look. Whereas the corporate has certainly taken steps to chop water utilization at its amenities, its calculations don’t account for the huge water wants of the ability vegetation that preserve the lights on at these exact same amenities. And not using a bigger dedication to mitigating Amazon’s underlying stress on electrical energy grids, conservation efforts by the corporate and its fellow tech giants will solely deal with a part of the issue, in keeping with specialists who spoke to Grist.
The highly effective servers in giant information facilities run scorching as they course of unprecedented quantities of knowledge, and maintaining them from overheating requires each water and electrical energy. Fairly than attempt to preserve these rooms cool with conventional air-conditioning models, many corporations use water as a coolant, operating it previous the servers to relax them out. The facilities additionally want large quantities of electrical energy to run all their servers: They already account for round 3 p.c of U.S. energy demand, a quantity that might greater than double by 2030. On high of that, the coal, gasoline, and nuclear energy vegetation that produce that electrical energy themselves devour even bigger portions of water to remain cool.
Will Hewes, who leads water sustainability for Amazon Net Providers, informed Grist that the corporate makes use of water in its information facilities with the intention to save on energy-intensive air-con models, thus decreasing its reliance on fossil fuels.
“Utilizing water for cooling in most locations actually reduces the quantity of power that we use, and so it helps us meet different sustainability objectives,” he mentioned. “We might all the time determine to not use water for cooling, however we wish to, quite a bit, due to these power and effectivity advantages.”
In an effort to save on power prices, the corporate’s information facilities must evaporate tens of millions of gallons of water per 12 months. It’s laborious to say for positive how a lot water the info middle trade consumes, however the ballpark estimates are substantial. One 2021 research discovered that U.S. information facilities consumed round 415,000 acre-feet of water in 2018, even earlier than the artificial-intelligence growth. That’s sufficient to produce round one million common houses yearly, or about as a lot as California’s Imperial Valley takes from the Colorado River every year to develop winter greens. One other research discovered that information facilities operated by Microsoft, Google, and Meta withdrew twice as a lot water from rivers and aquifers as your complete nation of Denmark.
It’s virtually sure that this quantity has ballooned even greater in recent times as corporations have constructed extra facilities to maintain up with the artificial-intelligence growth, since AI packages similar to ChatGPT require huge quantities of server actual property. Tech corporations have constructed lots of of recent information facilities in the previous few years alone, and they’re planning lots of extra. One current estimate discovered that ChatGPT requires an average-sized bottle of water for each 10 to 50 chat responses it supplies. The on-site water consumption at any one in every of these corporations’ information facilities might now rival that of a significant beverage firm similar to PepsiCo.
Amazon doesn’t present statistics on its absolute water consumption; Hewes informed Grist the corporate is “centered on effectivity.” Nevertheless, the tech large’s water utilization is probably going decrease than a few of its rivals — partially as a result of the corporate has constructed most of its information facilities with so-called evaporative cooling techniques, which require far much less water than different cooling applied sciences and solely activate when temperatures get too excessive. The corporate pegs its water utilization at round 10 p.c of the trade common, and in temperate places similar to Sweden, it doesn’t use any water to chill down information facilities besides throughout peak summer season temperatures.
Firms can cut back the environmental impression of their AI enterprise by constructing them in temperate areas which have loads of water, however they need to stability these effectivity considerations with considerations about land and electrical energy prices, in addition to the should be near main clients. Current research have discovered that information middle water consumption within the U.S. is “skewed towards water burdened subbasins” in locations just like the Southwest, however Amazon has clustered a lot of its enterprise farther east, particularly in Virginia, which boasts low-cost energy and monetary incentives for tech companies.
“A variety of the places are pushed by buyer wants, but additionally by [prices for] actual property and energy,” mentioned Hewes. “Some huge parts of our information middle footprint are in locations that aren’t tremendous scorching, that aren’t in tremendous water burdened areas. Virginia, Ohio — they get scorching in the summertime, however then there are huge chunks of the 12 months the place we don’t want to make use of water for cooling.” Even so, the corporate’s growth in Virginia is already inflicting considerations over water availability.
To mitigate its impacts in such basins, the corporate additionally funds dozens of conservation and recharge initiatives just like the one in Chile. It donates recycled water from its information facilities to farmers, who use it to irrigate their crops, and it has additionally helped restore the rivers that offer water-stressed cities similar to Cape City, South Africa; in northern Virginia, it has labored to put in cowl crop farmland that may cut back runoff air pollution in native waterways. The corporate treats these initiatives the way in which different corporations deal with carbon offsets, counting every gallon recharged towards a gallon it consumes at its information facilities. Amazon mentioned in its most up-to-date sustainability report that it’s 41 p.c of the way in which to assembly its aim of being “water constructive.” In different phrases, it has funded initiatives that recharge or preserve somewhat over 4 gallons of water for each 10 gallons of water it makes use of.
However regardless of all this, the corporate’s water stewardship aim doesn’t embrace the water consumed by the ability vegetation that offer its information facilities. This consumption will be as a lot as three to 10 occasions as giant because the on-site water consumption at an information middle, in keeping with Shaolei Ren, a professor of engineering on the College of California, Riverside, who research information middle water utilization. For instance, Ren pointed to an Amazon information middle in Pennsylvania that depends on a nuclear energy plant lower than a mile away. That information middle makes use of round 20 p.c of the ability plant’s capability.
“They are saying they’re utilizing little or no water, however there’s an enormous water evaporation occurring simply close by, and that’s for powering their information middle,” he mentioned.
Firms like Amazon can cut back this secondary water utilization by counting on renewable power sources, which don’t require wherever close to as a lot water as conventional energy vegetation. Hewes says the corporate has been making an attempt to “handle down” each water and power wants by a separate aim of working on one hundred pc renewable power, however Ren factors out that the corporate’s information facilities want round the clock energy, which implies intermittently out there renewables like photo voltaic and wind farms can solely go thus far.
Amazon isn’t the one firm coping with this drawback. CyrusOne, one other main information middle agency, revealed in its sustainability report earlier this 12 months that it used greater than eight occasions as a lot water to supply energy because it did on-site at its information facilities.
“So long as we’re reliant on grid electrical energy that features thermoelectric sources to energy our amenities, we’re not directly answerable for the consumption of enormous quantities of water within the manufacturing of that electrical energy,” the report mentioned.
As for replenishment initiatives just like the one in Chile, they too will solely go a part of the way in which towards decreasing the impression of the info middle explosion. Even when Amazon’s cloud operations are “water constructive” on a worldwide scale, with initiatives in lots of the similar basins the place it owns information facilities, that doesn’t imply it received’t nonetheless compromise water entry in particular watersheds. The corporate’s information facilities and their energy vegetation should withdraw extra water than the corporate replenishes in a given space, and replenishment initiatives in different aquifers world wide received’t handle the bodily penalties of that particular overdraft.
“If they can seize a number of the rising water and clear it and return to the group, that’s higher than nothing, however I believe it’s not likely decreasing the precise consumption,” Ren mentioned. “It masks out numerous actual issues, as a result of water is a extremely regional challenge.”
Correction: This story has been corrected to make clear that Amazon’s “water constructive” pledge applies solely to its net providers division.
This text initially appeared in Grist. Grist is a nonprofit, impartial media group devoted to telling tales of local weather options and a simply future. Be taught extra at Grist.org.
