Russian fuel flows via Ukraine stopped within the early hours of Wednesday after a transit deal between the 2 international locations expired within the wake of Moscow’s full-scale invasion.
The pipeline was one of many final two routes nonetheless carrying Russian fuel to Europe almost three years into the full-scale warfare. EU international locations will lose about 5 per cent of fuel imports in the course of winter.
Whereas merchants had lengthy anticipated flows to cease, the tip of the pipeline route via Ukraine will have an effect on Europe’s fuel stability at a time when demand for heating is excessive. Slovakia is the nation most affected.
“Whereas one would assume that shedding these volumes [is] priced in, a powerful upward value response initially isn’t out of the query,” stated Aldo Spanjer, senior commodities strategist at BNP Paribas.
The deal to permit Russian fuel to go via Ukraine was agreed on the finish of 2019, signed a day earlier than the earlier 10-year contract between the nationwide fuel firms was set to run out. On the time, the European Fee strongly promoted the deal.
After Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, nonetheless, the fee inspired member states to hunt various provides because the bloc moved to wean itself off Russian fossil gasoline imports. The Moscow-friendly governments of Hungary and Slovakia have resisted that shift and have sought to increase the deal past January 1.
The Ukrainian authorities had telegraphed months upfront that it was unwilling to barter an extension to the deal, because it needed to deprive the Kremlin of its earnings from fuel exports. Ending the flows would lead to a $6.5bn loss for Russia, until it may redirect them, in response to the Brussels-based think-tank, Bruegel.
However it might even be a monetary blow to Ukraine, which earned about $1bn a 12 months in fuel transit charges, although solely a couple of fifth of that was gross income. Analysts have urged that Ukraine’s huge fuel pipeline infrastructure may face growing Russian assault if there was no Russian fuel flowing via it.
Russia’s Gazprom stated in a Telegram publish on Wednesday that the transit deal expired on account of Ukraine’s “repeated and express refusal” to increase the agreements. “Since 8:00 Moscow time, the availability of Russian fuel for its transportation via the territory of Ukraine has not been carried out,” it stated.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico visited Moscow on December 22 to debate the fuel transit contract. He blasted Ukraine’s intransigence on the deal, asking whether or not the nation had “the proper to wreck the financial nationwide pursuits of an [EU] member state”.
Fico stated on Fb shortly earlier than the deal’s expiry that “different fuel transit choices than Russian fuel had been offered to Ukrainian companions, however these had been additionally rejected by the Ukrainian president”. The Slovak prime minister has additionally threatened to chop off back-up electrical energy provides from Slovakia to Ukraine as retaliation.
Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has likewise sought to discover a workaround to permit Russian fuel imports through Ukraine. His authorities has additionally turned to the final remaining pipeline delivery Russian fuel through Turkey and to neighbouring Romania to enhance provides.
Austria, which nonetheless imported Russian fuel all through 2024, has shifted to various sources similar to liquid pure fuel imports. Its power firm OMV in mid-December terminated its long-term contract with Gazprom due to a authorized dispute.
The cut-off of fuel can even have a major impression on neighbouring Moldova, which in mid-December launched a state of emergency within the power sector due to the uncertainty round Russian fuel transit.
The halt to Russian fuel flows via Ukraine is more likely to enhance European demand for pricier LNG, for which Asia can also be competing.
EU officers have been adamant that the bloc can reside with out Russian pipeline provides, even when it means accepting costlier shipped fuel from elsewhere.
The European Fee stated on Tuesday it didn’t anticipate disruption. “European fuel infrastructure is versatile sufficient to supply fuel of non-Russian origin to central and jap Europe through various routes,” it stated. “It has been bolstered with important new LNG import capacities since 2022.”
The Turkey pipeline nonetheless transporting Russian fuel to Europe contributes about 5 per cent of the EU’s imports. The US not too long ago imposed sanctions on Gazprombank, the primary conduit for Russian power funds.
However to mitigate the impression of sanctions, Russian President Vladimir Putin in early December dropped a requirement for overseas consumers of Russian fuel to pay via the financial institution. Nations similar to Turkey and Hungary additionally stated they’ve obtained US exemptions from sanctions.
“The sanctions had beforehand added an additional layer of uncertainty over the destiny of Europe’s remaining Russian fuel provide as we enter the brand new 12 months, serving to to maintain fuel costs risky,” stated Natasha Fielding, head of European fuel pricing at Argus Media, a pricing company. The US waiver meant that “consumers of Russian fuel delivered via the Turkish Stream pipeline may breathe a sigh of reduction”, she stated.
Merchants will not be ruling out a rise in Russian fuel flows into Europe sooner or later. European firms which might be reeling from excessive fuel and power costs, forcing them to chop again manufacturing, would return to purchasing Russian fuel, which was inherently cheaper than LNG, one senior dealer stated.
“At some stage there might be a peace settlement . . . Folks will need to finish the warfare, due to this fact they need to signal a peace settlement. One of many issues Russia will get is its skill to resupply” Europe with fuel, the dealer stated.
Whereas European governments could impose restrictions to forestall the continent from as soon as once more turning into over-reliant on Russian fuel, the dealer stated, “you’d anticipate to see some Russian fuel again in Europe, as a result of basically, geography has not modified”.
Extra reporting by Andrew Bounds
