BRATISLAVA, Jan 06 (IPS) – “Lots of people are very scared,” says Zalina Marshenkulova. “That is clearly one other instrument of repression. The state is waging warfare on the remnants of free-thinking individuals in Russia and making an attempt to suppress all dissent and freedom,” the Russian feminist activist tells IPS.
The warning from Marshenkulova, who left Russia quickly after the nation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and now lives in Germany, comes simply days after new laws got here into pressure in her residence nation banning “child-free propaganda.”
Underneath the legislation, any individual, organisation or authorities official deemed to be selling a “child-free” life-style or encouraging individuals, both in individual or on-line, to not have kids can face big fines and, in some instances, could also be deported.
Whereas MPs have pressured the laws wouldn’t infringe on the precise of people to not have kids, critics worry will probably be utilized in what some have described as an ongoing “campaign” by the Kremlin to advertise a deeply conservative ideology centred round ‘conventional values’ and rejecting decadent Western methods of life—even on the expense of ladies’s reproductive rights.
“Ladies are already shopping for up all types of contraceptive capsules . Abortions are already exhausting to get and that’s solely going to get even more durable now,” says Marshenkulova.
The laws, which got here into impact on December 4, introduces fines for people spreading “child-free propaganda” in broadcast media or on-line of as much as 400,000 rubles (€3,840), whereas firms doing so will be fined as much as 5 million rubles (€48,000) for a similar offence. International residents who fall foul of the laws will face deportation.
Its supporters have stated the laws is important to guard Russia towards a dangerous Western ideology that might have devastating penalties for a rustic combating worrying adverse demographic traits.
“We’re speaking about defending residents, primarily the youthful technology, from data disseminated within the media area that has a adverse impression on the formation of individuals’s personalities,” Vyacheslav Volodin, chairman of the decrease home of parliament, stated forward of the vote. “All the things should be accomplished to make sure that new generations of our residents develop up centred on conventional household values.”
However human rights teams and activists say they’ve grave considerations about it. They level out that it has equally imprecise language to different repressive legal guidelines handed in Russia in recent times which were used to persecute minorities, resembling LGBT+ individuals, and authorities critics, together with civil society teams, in addition to opponents of the invasion of Ukraine.
The relative novelty of the laws means it’s exhausting to gauge how strictly will probably be carried out and what precisely authorities will see as ‘childfree propaganda’.
Nevertheless it has already had some impact.
“The legislation is imprecise and broadly formulated so we will’t predict what issues will probably be thought of punishable—nobody is aware of,” Anastasiia Zakharova, a lawyer on the Memorial Human Rights Defence Centre, informed IPS.
“For instance, a scenario the place girls share publicly issues like how exhausting it may be as a mom, how tough it may be elevating children—will that be thought of childfree propaganda? We’ve already seen that teams on social media the place girls discuss how exhausting it’s elevating kids and being a mom have closed all the way down to keep away from probably being fined. This legislation can have a chilling impact on what individuals will say,” she added.
Others say expertise with Russian legal guidelines resembling these launched within the final decade banning “LGBT+ propaganda” offers a information for the way this laws might impression girls’s lives.
“That is one other a part of the Kremlin’s dangerous ‘conventional values’ campaign. It is going to restrict girls’s freedom, their reproductive freedoms, and can stifle freedom usually,” Tanya Lokshina, Europe and Central Asia affiliate director at Human Rights Watch (HRW), informed IPS.
“We are able to predict what the results of this legislation will probably be as a result of it’s just like the anti-LGBT+ propaganda legislation in Russia and now we have seen the results of that. It’s not a lot that this type of legislation targets people; it’s about purging the cultural enviornment of something that could possibly be even vaguely interpreted as propaganda,” she added.
She stated whereas this might see an unlimited quantity of movies, exhibits and books disappearing from store cabinets, TV schedules, and on-line streaming companies—”for instance, a ‘romcom’ movie by which you see a lady in her thirties with no kids pursuing her profession—something like that’s going to be outlawed. Are you able to think about what number of movies, TV exhibits, books, and so on. might need to be banned due to that? It’s mind-boggling,” she stated—it might additionally considerably impression reproductive well being.
“Will kids be capable of get details about abortion and contraception? We noticed what occurred with the anti-LGBT+ legislation when lecturers and others who ought to have been serving to them couldn’t, or wouldn’t, discuss . If kids wanted assist, they couldn’t get it,” she stated.
Different rights activists agreed.
“There will probably be issues for ladies to get details about abortions, contraception, and different reproductive well being issues and will probably be notably tough for younger individuals who already may already be combating getting maintain of data on this stuff and now received’t have any approach in any respect to entry it,” Natalia Morozova, Head of the Jap Europe/Central Asia Desk on the Worldwide Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), informed IPS.
This comes at a time when girls’s entry to abortion is already being curtailed.
Elective abortion is authorized in Russia as much as the 12th week of being pregnant, and in some distinctive instances, resembling rape, as much as the 22nd week. Nevertheless, in recent times there have been strikes to restrict entry to the process.
Legal guidelines have been launched in some areas outlawing “coercing” girls—the laws defines this as persuading, bribing, or deceiving a lady into present process the process—to have an abortion, whereas a whole bunch of personal clinics throughout the nation have adopted a ‘voluntarily initiative’ supported by the Well being Ministry and have stopped providing abortions.
The state has additionally launched tips for medical doctors to encourage feminine sufferers to have kids, but additionally to dissuade them from abortions.
“Already in state clinics in Russia, medical doctors put strain on girls to have kids. There are girls who’ve gone to a clinic and been questioned by medical doctors on why they haven’t any kids and why they don’t need to have them but,” stated Lokshina.
Well being specialists have already pointed to the hazards of limiting abortions, with World Well being Organisation (WHO) officers beforehand warning that bans on personal clinics performing abortions would pressure extra girls in Russia into having surgical abortions quite than medical abortions. Personal clinics primarily provide medical abortions, whereas state hospitals carry out surgical abortions, which carry greater dangers of problems, unintended effects and accidents.
The WHO additionally raised considerations that tightening entry to authorized abortions might result in a spike in harmful unlawful procedures.
This tightening of entry to abortion and the passing of the ‘childfree propaganda’ legislation come because the Kremlin battles a demographic disaster amid rising mortality as Russia’s brutal warfare in Ukraine grinds on and the nation’s beginning fee falls.
Knowledge from statistics service Rosstat confirmed 599,600 kids have been born in Russia within the first half of 2024, which is 16,000 fewer births year-on-year and the bottom determine since 1999. In the meantime, the variety of newborns fell 6 p.c in June to 98,600, which is the primary time the quantity fell beneath 100,000. There have been 325,100 deaths recorded between January and June, which is 49,000 greater than in the identical interval of 2023.
The Kremlin has known as the demographic scenario a “disaster” for the nation and lawmakers who backed the ‘childfree propaganda’ laws see it as a approach to assist halt inhabitants decline.
However Morozova stated the Kremlin’s most important motive was bolstering its armed forces to proceed combating in Ukraine.
“They need a inhabitants that produces troopers, girls that produce troopers. The one purpose of this regime is to supply as many troopers as attainable,” she stated.
In accordance with Lokshina, the legislation will even give the Kremlin an additional instrument in its struggle towards a bunch that many specialists see as probably the most important menace to President Putin’s maintain on energy.
“Essentially the most notable protests because the begin of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine have been girls’s protests. The Kremlin sees girls as being problematic and needs to silence them,” she stated.
Whereas it stays to be seen how the legislation will probably be carried out and interpreted by authorities sooner or later, some activists have already left the nation in response to its passage, fearing it could possibly be used towards them.
However there are doubts the laws can have any impact on the beginning fee.
Some Russian girls who spoke to western media forward of the laws’s approval stated girls’s choices on whether or not to have kids or not are largely rooted in monetary considerations at a time when the economic system is struggling, quite than anybody else’s opinion on their proper to have kids or not.
And analysis carried out by the All-Russian Public Opinion Analysis Heart (VTsIOM) in October confirmed that 66 p.c of Russians doubted fines for selling childfree ideology can be efficient.
“The legislation has no potential to affect the beginning fee,” stated Lokshina. “It’s geared toward stifling dissent—on this case, the rejection of so-called conventional household values.”
IPS UN Bureau Report
Observe @IPSNewsUNBureau
Observe IPS Information UN Bureau on Instagram
© Inter Press Service (2025) — All Rights ReservedUnique supply: Inter Press Service
